Title and challenging topic mediocrity.
philosophers and writers of all ages have addressed the topic. Great men, scholars, sociologists and psychologists of the past hosts and analysts, all to pontificate on mediocrity, on the average ... but deep down they know what all these gentlemen being mediocre?
You can pontificate and do so on the whole work of man: and we read a book while not writers, we take our ideas, we judge the work of a writer, maybe not being able to write without even a Twit spelling errors, and when they accidentally end up in a museum or art gallery we are all ready, mediocre or not, to analyze light technical fin'anche the message of the artist, we are the same ovviamante they call the painter for the white paint! Examples of this type filled with one thousand blog ... and then, you say (N dA: the vain hope that someone reads this post) ? Judges, judged, judgments Everything is tied to an aesthetic sense, more or less common to hear, to read, interpreting the message that the author of a generic generic work on the sticky ... but we are talking about "things" rather than "men" ... but what then is the mediocrity of men and not of works ... and then what is the "aesthetic" portena to speak?
Who but a mediocre DOC may tell himself, and then mediocrity? ... We mediocre, as such, do not judge someone like that or try to understand, especially those who do not have a license for mediocrity, driving hard to get, do not you by anyone, do not buy, you can not study from mediocrity, and the result is reached on the field after years of battles and as many defeats, hopes and projects demolished wrong and even then you need time to absorb your state, you find it difficult to believe. What can I know the frustration those who sell thousands of copies (CDs, books, contacts on the blog), who won for the success of the merits and abilities. We are something else ... We are the ones who know how to fail, be a step back, have beautiful ideas that never materialized and only our fault!
car this morning thinking about the topic of this post, I thought that basically the problem can be summed up as "superficial" ... of course I do not consider it a superficial, not in the usual sense, I'd say reasonably the contrary, the effect is superficial and not the cause, let me explain better: to be curious about everything but never come to anything concrete, myriad activities begin concluderene and no, a thousand interests have always stopping at the surface. Further simplifying the approach has always been the best result with minimum effort, which is always translated with the failure to investigate a anything, interests, hobbies, sports, work, the enthusiasm of the early kid breaks just reached sufficiency, similar to the general principles a nice salute to the desire to continue, after the curiosity over the news, on ... move immediately to another or in the absence of alternatives to the state of amoeba move equivalent to the scene: sofa + tv + brain off!
E 'life difficult, stressful, fighting constantly between curiosity and fancazzismo is an ... running behind the desire to do and at the same time find very inviting sofa with television is attached scizzofrenia.
The final budget results in a mediocre life ... and not the median.
philosophers and writers of all ages have addressed the topic. Great men, scholars, sociologists and psychologists of the past hosts and analysts, all to pontificate on mediocrity, on the average ... but deep down they know what all these gentlemen being mediocre?
You can pontificate and do so on the whole work of man: and we read a book while not writers, we take our ideas, we judge the work of a writer, maybe not being able to write without even a Twit spelling errors, and when they accidentally end up in a museum or art gallery we are all ready, mediocre or not, to analyze light technical fin'anche the message of the artist, we are the same ovviamante they call the painter for the white paint! Examples of this type filled with one thousand blog ... and then, you say (N dA: the vain hope that someone reads this post) ? Judges, judged, judgments Everything is tied to an aesthetic sense, more or less common to hear, to read, interpreting the message that the author of a generic generic work on the sticky ... but we are talking about "things" rather than "men" ... but what then is the mediocrity of men and not of works ... and then what is the "aesthetic" portena to speak?
Who but a mediocre DOC may tell himself, and then mediocrity? ... We mediocre, as such, do not judge someone like that or try to understand, especially those who do not have a license for mediocrity, driving hard to get, do not you by anyone, do not buy, you can not study from mediocrity, and the result is reached on the field after years of battles and as many defeats, hopes and projects demolished wrong and even then you need time to absorb your state, you find it difficult to believe. What can I know the frustration those who sell thousands of copies (CDs, books, contacts on the blog), who won for the success of the merits and abilities. We are something else ... We are the ones who know how to fail, be a step back, have beautiful ideas that never materialized and only our fault!
car this morning thinking about the topic of this post, I thought that basically the problem can be summed up as "superficial" ... of course I do not consider it a superficial, not in the usual sense, I'd say reasonably the contrary, the effect is superficial and not the cause, let me explain better: to be curious about everything but never come to anything concrete, myriad activities begin concluderene and no, a thousand interests have always stopping at the surface. Further simplifying the approach has always been the best result with minimum effort, which is always translated with the failure to investigate a anything, interests, hobbies, sports, work, the enthusiasm of the early kid breaks just reached sufficiency, similar to the general principles a nice salute to the desire to continue, after the curiosity over the news, on ... move immediately to another or in the absence of alternatives to the state of amoeba move equivalent to the scene: sofa + tv + brain off!
E 'life difficult, stressful, fighting constantly between curiosity and fancazzismo is an ... running behind the desire to do and at the same time find very inviting sofa with television is attached scizzofrenia.
The final budget results in a mediocre life ... and not the median.
0 comments:
Post a Comment